pages checked
The complete navigable site, not a favourable sample.
Hong Kong small law firms · 香港小型律師事務所
Evidence before promises.
I verify one useful website problem, explain the commercial effect, and define a safe first fix before you commit to a rebuild or long SEO retainer.
Fixed first scope No ranking promise Jay handles the work
01 / Evidence
Facts a decision maker can reproduce.
An anonymised review of a five-page Hong Kong small-firm website, checked 30 July 2026. The firm is not named because public evidence should start a private conversation, not a public criticism campaign.
shared one title
A repeatable search-visibility problem across every checked page.
missed the mobile viewport
A site-wide mobile-readiness defect verified page by page.
dedicated family pages
The service appeared only inside one combined practice list.
Illustrative structure only — not a named client result.
Material study / duplicate structure
02 / Material finding
Count the underlying problem once.
A missing family-law page and several missing topic pages may come from the same website structure. I record the overlap, explain the root cause, and price the useful fix once. The audit should not look bigger simply because one problem has several symptoms.
- Checked against
- Complete page list
- Decision
- One root cause
- Next step
- One bounded fix
03 / Method
From a public page to a bounded fix.
The process is deliberately legible. A firm owner should be able to see where a finding came from, why it matters, and what the first piece of work includes.
-
01
Observe
Record the exact public page, device, behaviour, and time checked.
-
02
Verify
Reproduce the issue and discard anything that depends on a weak assumption.
-
03
Prioritise
Separate a commercially meaningful problem from useful but supporting improvements.
-
04
Fix
Define the safe change, rollback point, and before-and-after check.
- Public page What can be checked?
- Observation What is actually happening?
- Impact Why could it matter?
- Bounded fix What is safe to change first?
Fixed first engagement
HK$4,800
5 working days
04 / Entry offer
Website Opportunity Sprint
A small first engagement to verify one high-confidence issue, make one safe bounded improvement, and leave a clear handover.
- Review of up to five agreed public pages
- One high-confidence issue reproduced and documented
- Evidence log with URL, date, confidence, and relevance
- One bounded implementation of up to four hours
- Before-and-after verification and handover
- 30-minute review call
Scope safeguard
Ask Jay about the sprint
If the selected fix cannot be implemented safely within four hours, the sprint delivers an implementation-ready brief. The full fee is credited against an approved follow-on completed within 30 days.
No ranking, traffic, enquiry, client, or revenue guarantee.- Day 1Agree pages
- Day 2Verify
- Day 3Define fix
- Day 4Implement
- Day 5Check + handover
Working note / 工作註記
If I cannot show where a finding came from, it does not belong in the proposal.— Jay
05 / About Jay
You speak to the person doing the work.
I handle each review, explanation, and agreed implementation myself. My role is to make the evidence clear enough that you can approve it, reject it, or hand it to your existing provider without first buying a vague retainer.
I provide website and implementation work. I am not a solicitor and do not give legal advice.
06 / Start with one observation
Send the website. Keep client matters out of the first message.
A website URL and the page or service you want reviewed are enough to start. Please do not send privileged communications, client names, case files, identity documents, or other confidential legal material.
Before a first sprint
Practical questions.
Do you guarantee rankings or enquiries?
No. The sprint guarantees a defined scope, a reproducible evidence record, and verification of the agreed work. Search rankings, traffic, enquiries, and revenue depend on factors outside one website change.
Does the firm need a new website?
Not by default. A rebuild is considered only when the existing platform blocks a useful fix or several verified issues share the same structural cause.
Why review only five pages first?
Five agreed pages keep the first engagement small while covering the homepage, a key service, a lawyer or team page, a contact path, and one priority topic.
Can the existing web provider implement the work?
Yes. The evidence log and implementation brief can be handed to an authorised provider. Access is requested only when Jay is implementing the agreed fix.